Tupac’s Outlaw EDI Mean Says Angie Martinez Should Not Release the Unheard Tupac Intervie
As debate continues to swirl around the possible release of Tupac Shakur’s unreleased 1996 interview with Angie Martinez, one of the closest voices to Tupac has stepped in with a clear and thoughtful perspective.
EDI Mean, a founding member of the Outlawz and longtime collaborator of Tupac Shakur, recently addressed the growing speculation following comments made by Angie Martinez during a conversation with Charlamagne Tha God.
While fans are eager to hear what many consider one of hip-hop’s most mysterious recordings, EDI Mean believes the interview should remain unreleased.
EDI Mean Reflects on the Interview’s Origins
According to EDI Mean, the interview took place during a very intense period in Tupac’s life. Angie Martinez, then a rising radio personality at Hot 97, had become one of the most influential voices in New York City radio. EDI explained that Tupac chose to speak with her specifically because she “had the ears of the streets” and could reach the East Coast directly — a region deeply tied to Tupac’s roots.
He also firmly dismissed long-standing internet rumors suggesting the tapes were sold or suppressed for financial reasons, calling those claims “absolutely false” and stating there was “zero truth” to them.
“Pac Wasn’t As Crazy As People Thought”
EDI Mean recalled being present during the interview and emphasized Tupac’s professionalism and respect, especially in how he conducted himself around Angie Martinez.
He described Tupac as:
-
Young and emotionally charged
-
Fresh out of prison and out on bail
-
Deeply affected by public perception and legal battles
Despite that intensity, EDI stressed that Tupac was composed, thoughtful, and intentional during the conversation — far from the reckless caricature often portrayed in media narratives.
Why EDI Mean Opposes Releasing the Interview
While acknowledging public curiosity, EDI Mean made it clear he does not support releasing the interview now.
His reasoning includes:
-
Timing: The interview is nearly 30 years old and reflects a specific moment that has long passed.
-
Relevance: In his view, the interview should have been released closer to when it was recorded if it was ever going to be released at all.
-
Context: Without proper historical framing, the interview could be misunderstood or sensationalized.
-
Integrity: He praised Angie Martinez for resisting pressure to release it for profit or attention.
EDI Mean contrasted today’s fast-paced news cycle with the 1990s, noting that modern audiences move on quickly and often lack the patience for deep historical nuance.
Respect for Angie Martinez’s Decision
Rather than criticizing Angie Martinez, EDI Mean commended her integrity and restraint.
He stated that many people would have rushed to monetize such a rare piece of history, but Martinez chose responsibility over hype — a decision he believes deserves respect.
“Salute to her for not trying to milk it or monetize it,” he said, adding that her hesitation shows character and awareness of the interview’s potential impact.
A Balanced Perspective in a Heated Debate
EDI Mean acknowledged that Tupac’s legacy remains omnipresent decades later and that debate around his words is inevitable. However, he questioned what true benefit releasing the interview would bring today, even though Tupac’s music and message remain timeless.
As speculation continues about whether Angie Martinez will ultimately release the interview, EDI Mean’s comments add an important voice — one grounded in proximity, memory, and responsibility rather than curiosity alone.
Final Thoughts
The conversation around Tupac’s unreleased interview highlights a larger question within hip-hop culture: Should every historical artifact be released, or are some moments best preserved rather than replayed?
For now, the interview remains unheard — and according to EDI Mean, that may be exactly where it belongs.
WorldWide Entertainment TV will continue to follow developments surrounding this story.
Share this content:



Post Comment